Need we think about what others think?

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

What We Think about Multi-particle Amplitudes

Certain classical solutions which serve as generating functions of tree multi-particle amplitudes are constructed in the KK ahler sigma model. The one-loop contribution to the multi-particle amplitudes is computed as the functional determinant in the background of such a classical eld.Topologically nontrivial solutions, that is generating functions of the instanton mediated multi-particle ampli...

متن کامل

What We Know; What We Think

Fifteen years of research studies have concluded unanimously that spreadsheet errors are both common and non-trivial. Now we must seek ways to reduce spreadsheet errors. Several approaches have been suggested, some of which are promising and others, while appealing because they are easy to do, are not likely to be effective. To date, only one technique, cell-by-cell code inspection, has been de...

متن کامل

What we think and what we know.

This is an editorial that has found a voice only after a lot of struggle about what ought to be said and what ought not. In this issue, Crespo et al. (1) examined data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) and reported that postmenopausal women taking hormone replacement therapy (HRT) have better lipoprotein profiles as well as some improvement in componen...

متن کامل

Amyloidosis: Why We Need to Think About It Sooner?

Amyloidosis constitutes a spectrum of diseases, unified by the morphological appearance of the amyloid protein deposits, the cardinal feature of this disorder. The term “amyloid” was first coined in 1838 to describe plant starch and was adopted by Rudolph Virchow in 1854 to describe amyloid deposits in tissues, because of its similarity to cellulose stained with iodine. Amyloidosis results from...

متن کامل

What I think when I think about treebanks

In this opinion piece, I present four somewhat controversial suggestions for the design of future treebanks: a) Treebanks should be based on adversarial samples, rather than pseudorepresentative samples. b) Treebanks should include multiple splits of the data, rather than just a single split, as in most treebanks today. c) They should include multiple annotations of each sentence, whenever poss...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Science

سال: 2015

ISSN: 0036-8075,1095-9203

DOI: 10.1126/science.349.6252.1067-b